From almost day one of becoming a comic book fan, I've been a fan of Jack Kirby's artwork.
Among my first comic book purchases was Marvel's Greatest Comics #57, which was a reprint of Fantastic Four
#75. The story's artwork by someone named "Jack Kirby" was so dynamic
and distinctive, it's no exaggeration to say that this single issue may
have been what "set the hook" (to use a fishing term) and made me a
comic book fan for life.
Later that year, a buddy of mine received his first issue of
FOOM Magazine (Marvel's fan publication). Trumpeting "Jack's Back", the
cover made it clear that this Jack Kirby guy was one important dude.
This, paired with the stunning artwork from MGC #57, cemented my
perception of Jack as a sort of demi-god of the comic book scene.
That perception was tempered somewhat as I grew older and became
aware of various voices within the comic industry and their competing
views of its own history. As with any large industry boasting such a
long and organic history, the comic biz had (and continues to have) its
share of competing perspectives, factions, and agendas. Sadly, these
divergent (sometimes contradictory) views of the same history can cloud
the character and contributions of its most prominent architects...even
a giant like Jack Kirby.
It's with this wary attitude that I now approach all comic book
histories, knowing full well that its narrative often conforms to the
perspective and proximity of the author. Even widely acclaimed comic
book histories like Gerard Jones' Men of Tomorrow (which I
recommended here) have a viewpoint not everyone is going to agree with
or appreciate...so imagine my wariness as I approached Kirby: King of Comics by Mark Evanier, a long time Kirby acolyte and chronicler.
As the first of two Kirby biographies, this hardcover volume is
intended to be a sort of "Silver Surfer" prelude to the more extensive
"Galactus-sized" biography the author is still working on. Despite the
streamlined approach of its "coffee table" format, Evanier still
provides a brisk overview of not only Kirby's long career but also the
early influences and attitudes that shaped it.
Of course, being primarily an "art book", the highlight of the book
was the impressive amount and variety of artwork. From childhood
sketches to his first professional gigs, from his Olympian heights to
his twilight years, the book offers a comprehensive overview of Kirby's
entire career....which, considering how prolific the man was, is no
small accomplishment. Better yet, many of the images are reproduced
from original artwork that Evanier procured from various sources, which
alone justifies the purchase price.
However, as much as I enjoyed
the artwork, Evanier's proximity to Kirby and his estate made the book
read more as hagiography than biography. Sure, in some respects
I was pleasantly surprised...such as Evanier often giving the benefit of
the doubt to Stan Lee (a well-beaten pinata of Kirby partisans) and
actually acknowledging (albeit passingly) various quirks of Kirby's
personality that may have contributed to the other problem I had with the book:
it's steady drumbeat of prosecution and victimhood.
Although the
negative aspects of a life should never be ignored, Evanier seemed to wallow in negativity by portraying Kirby as little more than a hard
working, yet hapless victim tossed this way and that by clueless and/or
vindictive know-nothings. Ironically, in an effort to make Kirby look
good by blaming most of his setbacks on the ungrateful or
uncomprehending nitwits around him (which apparently included everyone
except his wife Roz), Evanier makes Kirby come off as an insecure,
paranoid masochist. That's unfortunate, because the essense of Kirby I
see in his artwork is full of joy, pride, and enthusiasm...and not the
beaten-down wage slave of Evanier's depressing hard luck tale.
Personally,
I would have loved to get more insights into the artwork itself,
Kirby's working process, or any other "behind the scenes" glimpses into
his marvelously creative mind, rather than the familiar litany of
personal slights and corporate screw-overs allegedly inflicted upon the
man. At one point, even the motivations of Kirby's various inkers were called
into question in a quote by fellow inker (and Kirby pal) Mike Royer:
"I kept seeing other artists trying to make Kirby work
look like their work and impose their viewpoints..."
This quote sums up my irritation with the book. Royer, who
should know better (at its core, the very act of inking another
artist's pencils is "imposing" another viewpoint), instead
characterizes the honest efforts of Kirby's fellow professionals in the
worst possible light...as if they had some anti-Kirby agenda they were
advancing. Worse yet, Evanier (for whatever reason) decided to include
it. This is the spirit of persecution and finger pointing that
characterizes so much of the book from Kirby's early career onward, and it's a
damn shame Evanier chose to take the story of this man's interesting
and influential life on such a low road.
I have no doubt matters
between Kirby and his employers caused him and his family grief and
aggravation...but at the same time, I don't think airing so much of
that dirty laundry was the way to go, since it ultimately made everyone
involved come across as petty and grasping...even Kirby himself.
Strangely, in the last chapter, Evanier characterizes Kirby's outlook during the final ten years of his life:
"The positive side won out, as it always had with Kirby."
Really, Mark? Now, Kirby may very well have "always" had a positive
outlook, but it's a quality that rarely (if ever) surfaces in the
preceding six chapters of "Somebody Done Him Wrong" songs....which is why I can only recommend this book on the strength of the artwork alone. For those who thrive on the "Big Company Screws Little Guy" narrative, this book (and Evanier's larger volume) is definitely for you...but for me? Eh...no thanks.