Most fanboys will agree that Batman's greatest arch-enemy is The Joker, and, depending on what day of the week it is, I'll usually agree. However, a really close second place (appropriately enough) has always been Two-Face.
Formerly a District Attorney and pal of Batman, Harvey Dent lost his sanity and turned to crime when one side of his face was hideously disfigured. Like his bizarrely mismatched new outfit, Dent's psyche was also split down the middle, requiring the flip of a coin to determine his good or bad actions. This constant theme of duality, beyond his chilling look and M.O., is the primary reason I enjoy Two-Face so much. He seems to embody the warring sides of human nature itself, as good and bad behavior coexist yet battle for control with the capriciousness of a coin flip.
However, much farther below the lofty metaphysical conflict of good vs. evil is another battle humanity wages on a daily basis: order vs. chaos (a.k.a. "neat vs. sloppy")...which Two-Face once again embodies here on the very clever cover of Batman #313 (1979).
Published toward the tail end of a more innocent era (before Batman comics became a steady slog of psycho-operatic angst), this Garcia Lopez illustration is a ton of fun. Channeling his inner-Felix and Oscar, Harvey Dent's "Odd Couple" decor is a joy for the eye to roam. A bright yellow couch, tidy office, clean carpeting, and tea set (!) contrasted with a filthy brown couch, broken furniture, stained carpeting, a bottle of booze, and cigarettes...with Two-Face perfectly centered between the two extremes.
As for Batman himself, it's nice (though a bit jarring) to see his costume's old blue and gray color scheme, isn't it? You'll also note that he's nicely highlighted by the room's converging perspective lines...not to mention that bit of mild symbolism as he reaches out to grab Harvey's scarred side (while staying withdrawn from his unscarred side).
"Crowning" the cover design is the classic 1970's Batman logo. With its bold block lettering and 40's-style Batman face, its symmetry fits especially well with a reflective (or warped reflective) cover like this one.
Now...if only the cover scene didn't remind me so much of that apartment I shared with three guys during college (two of us were neat, and two of us were slobs).
Wow, great post! Two-Face was awesome, absolutely one of the best characters in comics history.
His character was based originally (the first story makes it explicit) on the RLS novel, Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde. The initial trilogy of stories in Detective (#66,68 and 80) are masterpieces, and the newspaper serial, which featured a grimmer ending, was amazing too.
Sadly Two-Face only appeared once in the Silver Age and that was a reprint in Batman Annual #3 (the World's Finest cover appearance turned out to be a hoax), and even there it was the second or third Two-Face (Paul Sloane) and the CCA required some substantial revisions to the artwork (to airbrush out a love triangle between Sloane and a stagehand's wife).
Posted by: Pat Curley | March 11, 2009 at 02:48 AM
That's right! I had forgotten that Two-Face was banished from Batman's Silver Age world (hence his absence from the Batman TV show). Thanks for the insights, Pat!
Posted by: Mark Engblom | March 11, 2009 at 06:56 AM
As much as I hate to stand against the march of time, I do miss some of those Denny O'Neil stories, with Neal Adams doing interiors.
Posted by: greyman24 | March 11, 2009 at 07:20 AM
Speaking of Batman's "old" costume color scheme-
I teach cartooning sometimes to kids, and one of my recent students, age 15, was discussing the new (and great) BRAVE AND THE BOLD cartoon currently running. About the look of Batman on this cartoon, he said, "I don't know. I mean, Batman dressed in blue and gray?!"
Yep. To him, that's just one more nutty costume version for a character who hasn't had a "regular" outfit in 20 years, thanks to the movies, cartoons, and endless "events" and such in the DC comics themselves. The "blue and gray" is a sort of aberration to him!
Feel old yet?
Al Bigley
Posted by: Al Bigley | March 11, 2009 at 08:28 AM
LOL! Oh yeah...I feel old almost every day from stories just like this. I suppose the non-blue & gray Batman has been the "norm" for most kids and teens, so seeing the old colors must be quite a shock. Speaking of the Brave and the Bold cartoon, I'm nuts about it. I've really been enjoying the stories with their lighter touch and sense of FUN. The recent Owl-Man story was a real gem.
"As much as I hate to stand against the march of time, I do miss some of those Denny O'Neil stories, with Neal Adams doing interiors."
Well, believe it or not, I've only experienced a few of those stories in my time as a comic book fan. I'd love to read them all some day...which leads me to a question for the rest of you: Is there a current reprint volume that DC has published that reprints the O'Neil-Adams run...preferably in color? I'm not aware of one, but it sure would be a crime not to have one available. I've seen a bunch of books reprinting their Green Lantern run, but nothing for Batman. What gives?
Posted by: Mark Engblom | March 11, 2009 at 08:51 AM
There aren't as many as you might think. Reading Neal's own checklist shows that they did seven stories in Batman together, one Brave & Bold, and four stories in Detective. Hugely influential of course and there is sufficient quantity for them to do a reprint book, which would be a great idea.
Posted by: Pat Curley | March 11, 2009 at 01:47 PM
The stories are reprinted in color in the Neal Adams Batman Hardcovers (3 volumes)
Posted by: Simon | March 11, 2009 at 01:58 PM
Thanks, guys! Wow...not that many together, huh? I assumed there were many more. Maybe Adams did more covers than he did interiors.
Thanks for the tip, Simon. I will add that book to my "buy" list ASAP.
Posted by: Mark Engblom | March 11, 2009 at 02:44 PM
Actually, not all the stories in those hardcovers are O'Neill/Adams pairings. Some of it's Neal's work with other writers (like Bob Haney on Brave and Bold).
Also be advised much of the art has been re-engineered by Adams, fast becoming the George Lucas of comics, so what you get in those HBs is NOT what you'd have gotten in the original comics. There are those who think it's a good thing that Neal's redone the art to reflect his current tastes and skill level. I am not one of them.
Caveat emptor.
Posted by: David Morefield | March 11, 2009 at 03:17 PM
Thanks for the warning, David. I read similar cautions on a few of the Amazon reviews, and it really gives me pause. I'm not a fan of Lucas-style fiddling...since I believe it reveals the towering egos of both Lucas and Adams (and the insecurity their earlier work obviously generates). Disappointing.
Maybe I'd be better off hunting down the individual original issues, especially since those reprint volumes run in the $35 to $50 range.
Posted by: Mark Engblom | March 11, 2009 at 04:01 PM
I loved Richard Moll's portrayal of Two-Face in the Animated series. They knew how to work with the dual nature of Harvey, and it was my first exposure to the character. Tommy Lee's version was closer to the Joker without the deadly practical joke.s
Posted by: ShadowWing Tronix | March 11, 2009 at 07:52 PM
I would not think that a complete collection of O'Neill-Adams' Batman in original would run you much on ebay if you weren't looking for mint and were willing to skip the ones you might already have in numerous reprints--GBSET reprints two of them and Waiting Graves was a Millenium issue IIRC.
I'm startled to see I have them all, but Batman was my character and those were my prime buying years; I should dig out that B&B House of Mystery X-Over and do a review. Looks like an interesting comic and I tended not to reread the B&Bs, so it might be entertaining to look at.
Posted by: Pat Curley | March 12, 2009 at 01:19 AM
I have this comic and have always loved this cover. And speaking of Batman: Brave and the Bold, I love it. I have a 3 year old and it gives me an excuse to watch it. The reason I am posting is because of your last comment: Were you one of the messy roommates or the one of the clean ones?
Posted by: Matt Byrd | March 12, 2009 at 04:17 PM
LOL! I was one of the cleanER ones. Of course, no college guy is completely tidy...but compared to the other two guys, me and the other roommate were pretty orderly.
Posted by: Mark Engblom | March 12, 2009 at 09:31 PM