As a relatively new comics fan back in the mid-70's, I remember how thrilled I was to come across a library book that gave a basic overview of comic book history. Though I no longer recall which book it was (possibly the Steranko History of Comic Books), I still vividly remember getting my first glimpse of all the "major milestone" covers. Seeing the debuts of Superman (Action Comics #1) and Batman (Detective Comics #27) was quite a revelation, but the biggest surprise might have been the cover of Captain America Comics #1 (1941), depicting a costume and shield that didn't quite match up with the Cap I had recently become familiar with.
Note the odd "half-mask" that just kind of rests on the top of Cap's head, along with his decidedly non-circular shield. Even as a kid, the bare neck made little sense, especially since his shoulders and upper torso were protected with some sort of scaled material (which I later found out to be "duralumin chain-mail"). And what about that triangular shield? How did Cap throw it?
Well, apparently Joe Simon and Jack Kirby (Cap's creators) had similar misgivings, since Cap's more complete mask and circular shield showed up in the very next issue. Although no explanation was given for the change (which was typical of that era), one was finally offered forty years later in Captain America #255 (1981). In arguably the best retelling of Cap's origin, collaborators Roger Stern and John Byrne added some interesting new details...one of which made it clear why the half-mask was never going to cut it functionally as well as aesthetically (click on the panels for a larger view):
Shortly after his costume's much-needed revisions, Cap also received his circular shield upgrade...from President Roosevelt himself!
See, this is what I enjoy so much about creative comic book storytelling... taking long-forgotten details (such as Cap's unfortunate half-mask and triangular shield) and finding interesting ways to weave them into the official history of the character. Of course, not all wonky costume elements deserve an official explanation (some are better left forgotten), but in certain cases, it can really add some richness to a character's history.
Was that J.Jonah Jameson with the camera? I didn't know he was that old...
Posted by: George C | September 08, 2008 at 09:25 AM
Funny you should mention that, since the 1994 MARVELS project by Kurt Busiek and Alex Ross established that Jonah was indeed a young reporter in the early 1940's.
At the time, it was somewhat plausible, but fourteen years later? Not so much.
Posted by: Mark Engblom | September 08, 2008 at 09:55 AM
I suppose you know the real-world reason for Cap's shield changing shape was because the MLJ (Archie) people felt it was too close to the costume of their character the Shield. Worked for the best, because I've heard Kirby preferred the round version anyway (made for more fun drawing, with Cap throwing it around).
Posted by: Jon Knutson | September 08, 2008 at 10:29 AM
No, I had never heard the account of the original shield running into copyright trouble. Yeah, I agree, the changes worked out for the best. The round shield is so distinctive, it's hard to imagine anything else had ever been considered. However, the round shield of the Golden Age era had a blue outermost stripe in addition to the red and white stripes...making it look a bit weird from today's perspective.
Posted by: Mark Engblom | September 08, 2008 at 10:54 AM
Goldarnit, I had that Cap issue, but now it appears to be missing from my collection. Guess I'll need to re-acquire it. Stern + Byrne + Cap = awesome.
Posted by: Pj Perez | September 08, 2008 at 11:00 AM
Yeah, scoop that one back up. As I said, it's probably the best retelling of Cap's origin I've come across, and that fantastic cover would have made a great poster. I've picked up most of the Stern/Byrne run over the past couple of years, and I highly recommend those issues as well.
Posted by: Mark Engblom | September 08, 2008 at 11:39 AM
The original shield (or a version thereof, I'm not sure) is now owned by Elijah Bradley aka Patriot of the Young Avengers.
Posted by: Nimbus | September 09, 2008 at 06:43 AM
I really miss Roger Stern. He was an ace Marvel writer/editor when I was a young ten-something reader in the 80s, and his Avengers run is arguably as good as that book ever got (to say nothing of his editorship of the Michelinie-Layton Iron Man, his run on Spider-Man, and the excellent Cap stories you highlight above). Even his West Coast Avengers was great! I heard a rumor they might bring him back for a run on Spider-Man, which would be wonderful. Thanks for the cool flashback!
Posted by: Brian | September 09, 2008 at 03:30 PM
I have that Cap issue and it remains a fave of my whole collection. Terrific script and phenom art by classic 80s John Byrne.
My favorite panel is that stop-action shot of Cap ramming his fist into that Bundist's jaw ... Cap providing facetious commentary the whole way!
Posted by: Hube | September 10, 2008 at 07:36 PM
Script by Stern I should have said ...
Posted by: Hube | September 10, 2008 at 07:37 PM
One of the Masters of Evil scrunched up the pointy shield at Avengers Mansion in [Avengers: Under Siege], but it may have been repaired by the Beyonder or something.
According to Marvel's web page that I've linked to, "Kate Bishop gave Eli one of Captain America's original triangular shields", but it's also referred to as a replica, which probably just means Marvel are confused too.
I believe I read something recently where another comics old-timer (could it be Stan Lee himself? and Cap #600?)bdeclared that Jack Kirby was incredibly forgetful in everyday life and couldn't reproduce Captain America's costume correctly without consulting a reference picture - Cap would have a star instead of an A on his forehead, whatever - but then most comics artists can show you their character costume reference drawings, and this is at a time when each different costume isn't composed of elements of the same United States flag shuffled around, unlike the 1940s. Cap did well not to be put in Uncle Sam's top hat, at least not in print.
Posted by: Robert Carnegie | September 26, 2009 at 06:58 PM