« Superman@70: Happy Daddy-O Day! | Main | Superman@70: Monkey Business »

June 16, 2008

Comments

PAUL SAETHER

The first time Curt Swan appeared in a Superman story (as far as I know) was in Superman #145.

In the story 'The night of March 31st'(Page 5, panel 4), the two guys in the closet watching Superman change are Swan (far right with pen over ear) and, I believe, publisher Harry (?) Donnefield {?}.

Michael Lee

What better way to be immortalized on this site than in a photo with you with the tool of his trade in his hand.

I might be wrong but wasn't this one of the rare stories where Curt inked his own pencils?

Mark Engblom

"I might be wrong but wasn't this one of the rare stories where Curt inked his own pencils?"

No, you're right, Michael. This was indeed one of the rare stories Curt pencilled and inked.

Mark Engblom

"The first time Curt Swan appeared in a Superman story (as far as I know) was in Superman #145."

Hey, cool! I'll have to check that out. Thanks, Paul!

Pat Curley

That's the "How many boo-boos can you spot" story; I covered it here (including the panel with Swan):

http://sacomics.blogspot.com/2006/03/night-of-march-31st-updated.html

Incidentally, the guy who found the fourth most errors was an MIT student who turned out to have a lifelong love affair with comics, like that kid genius you mentioned a week or two ago.

I always liked Swan's work. It was very neat, tidy and consistent, if occasionally a little on the sterile side (which may have been Weisinger's influence).

meng

Curt Swan was always three yards and a cloud of dust for me... utterly reliable and rock solid. his Superman in the 50s, 60s and into the 70s was absolutely without peer.

some of the more science fiction-y stuff that looked so realistic back in the day did grow a tad anachronistic by the 70s and 80s... like any robot/android, brainiac's (literal) flying saucer or any alien/monster- the creature Mxy turns Superman into in Superman 335 comes to mind. but to his last panel, his clean storytelling and sense of proportion & scale, puts all the Rob Liefields, Michael Turners and Ethan Van Scivers of today to shame...

Mark Engblom

"some of the more science fiction-y stuff that looked so realistic back in the day did grow a tad anachronistic by the 70s and 80s."

Yeah, I have to admit, that kind of stuff was a little shaky later on. I used to wince a little bit at Curt's B.E.M.'s (Bug-Eyed Monsters), and the guy couldn't draw the "ears" on Batman's mask to save his life....but those weaknesses were utterly surpassed by his many strengths. Too bad they stuck him with a hack inker like Frank Chiaramonte for most of the late 70's and early 80's. It really seemed to take the wind out of Curt (which is completely understandable).

The comments to this entry are closed.

Visit My Shop:


Blog powered by Typepad