You know, for as much fun as I have at the expense of old comics, I really do have a high regard for them. Not just for the simple pleasures of their stories, but also for the professionalism of the people behind them. Sure, they knew their audience was largely children and teenagers, but there were times I really felt like we were respected as loyal customers whose patronage was genuinely appreciated, instead of just stupid kids who'd continue buying their product no matter what they charged.
That was never more apparent than when DC or Marvel would publicly discuss price increases with their young readers. As the more formal of the two companies, DC Comics went for the pseudo-letterhead aproach below for their sober assessment of the change from 12¢ to 15¢ comics (click on the letter for a larger view)...
It almost seems like something from a different age, doesn't it? How quaint...a publisher grateful for my patronage? A publisher realizing that we're all feeling the pinch? That they promise to try harder to keep our business?
Seriously, do you think we'd ever see anything like this today? Don't bet on it...despite the fact that the cover price of a comic book is now twenty times higher than it was in 1969, we don't get any of the charming "hat in hand" humility or gratitude you read in the above letter.
Here's my question: why should the simple courtesy and authentic gratitude on display in that letter be considered a quaint archeological find and not a continued practice? Or are we just too sophisticated for that now?
It wasn't just the "we're sorry we're raising prices letters." The letters pages, the fun-loving, "I can't believe we're doing this" attitude (especially at Marvel), the whole "stories YOU demanded" attitude...the whole she-bang seemed more joyous and caring back then.
It is interesting, as that was all pre-convention, pre-interent, pre-"professional" fan media. Now that the distance between the companies and the fanbase has dwindled, it almost seems as if they've deliberately pulled back and put up defensive shields.
Or perhaps it's our rose-coloured youth speaking...
Posted by: Brian Disco Snell | December 10, 2007 at 03:01 PM
I think part of the reason you won't see a letter like this anymore is because the comics industry wouldn't want to call attention to the price increase. It's one thing to mention it if it's a rarity. If you're doing it every few years, as a company you hope the costumer is in the habit of buying and doesn't notice.
Another part may that, when it comes to marketing entertainment, the advertising style these days tends toward the sarcastic. With this in mind, an entertainment company like DC or Marvel probably wouldn't think to draft a genuine letter of thanks to fans.
Posted by: McRingtail | December 10, 2007 at 03:13 PM
I've been thinking about this very thing lately while re-reading the "old" (70s and 80s) Marvels. However calculated to look "friendly" (a good marketing ploy, after all), there seemed to be a genuine interaction on those old letters pages, and a respect for one another (esp., as I've said many a time, on the late Mark Gruenwald's books) that's refreshing. In fairness, the flip side of this is that the letters were often smarter, friendlier and more respectful, too-- publishers can be skinflints, but we (and I include myself here) can be snarks on our blogs (which is often good). So maybe it evens out.
Posted by: cinephile | December 10, 2007 at 04:37 PM
"It wasn't just the "we're sorry we're raising prices letters." The letters pages, the fun-loving, "I can't believe we're doing this" attitude (especially at Marvel), the whole "stories YOU demanded" attitude...the whole she-bang seemed more joyous and caring back then."
Nice. You really touched on something there. I should try looking up one of the Marvel price increase announcements. You're right...those were even MORE reluctant or downcast in their tone than DC's were.
Posted by: Mark Engblom | December 10, 2007 at 04:54 PM
"Another part may that, when it comes to marketing entertainment, the advertising style these days tends toward the sarcastic. With this in mind, an entertainment company like DC or Marvel probably wouldn't think to draft a genuine letter of thanks to fans."
You're right...there's enough sarcasm and irony to go around these days...on both sides of the publisher/customer divide. Maybe you're right...maybe we're all "too cool for the room" when it comes to the simple courtesies of decades past, and any message of humility on the publisher's part would be greeted with the usual catcalls, disdain, and venom.
Posted by: Mark Engblom | December 10, 2007 at 04:59 PM
"In fairness, the flip side of this is that the letters were often smarter, friendlier and more respectful, too-- publishers can be skinflints, but we (and I include myself here) can be snarks on our blogs (which is often good). So maybe it evens out."
I think you're right, Cinephile. As I touched on in my previous comment, maybe the change goes beyond the behavior and outlook of the publishers themselves and extends to whole shabang, publishers AND retailers AND fans. Perhaps we're all one big, jaded mass of bitterness, huh? Well, maybe it's not that bad yet....but that old letter certainly gives me pause as to how far (or low) we've come in the years since.
Posted by: Mark Engblom | December 10, 2007 at 05:02 PM
As another wrinkle in this-- I was looking at an old issue of COMICS FEATURE the other day (anyone remember that one?), and one of their columnists had a long, thoughtful article about how marvel raising their price to 50 cents (this was in 1980) would "destroy" comic book collecting by putting comics out of reach of buyers. It's not a bad column, but looking back, it feels like such a shock-- 50 cents being this big rubicon, whereas 27 years later, the prices are much, much higher.
Posted by: cinephile | December 10, 2007 at 08:05 PM
Comics Feature, eh? Wow, that brings me back. I vaguely recall reading something like that. I suppose us fans have been sounding the death knell of comics ever since the first letters page...and that definitely puts things in perspective. But man...I can't justify many more price increases. I've already cut way, way back on my purchases, and there's always room for more.
Posted by: Mark Engblom | December 10, 2007 at 09:01 PM
I think another key to the reasoning, here, may lie in the "Your parents have to pay more for food, clothing and rent," line. Such a realization would not be intuitive for the comic industry's target audience at the time. By contrast, the average reader, today, has a greater grasp on economic trends and inflation.
That said, I have to say that the pricing of today's books has been a barrier to getting back into being a regular reader. It's difficult to justify, as an adult, the $25 to $50/week habit of my youth (which, given today's pricing, would translate into $40 to $70.
Posted by: greyman | December 21, 2007 at 05:50 PM